Don McLeroy defends Texas creationists
Today’s issue of the Waco Tribune-Herald features a guest column from Don McLeroy, chairman of the Texas State Board of Education. McLeroy, as mentioned previously on this blog, is a creationist.
Texas is adopting new science standards. Scientists representing evolutionists and calling themselves the 21st Century Science Coalition say that creationists on the State Board of Education will inject religion into the science classroom. Should they be concerned? No. This will not happen.
They also say that the board will require supernatural explanations to be placed in the curriculum. This will not happen.
First of all, this is the first I’ve ever heard of the 21st Century Science Coalition. Googling reveals their website, located here. In any case, I find it interesting that McLeroy singles this one organization out. This seems to give the appearance that this is one of the only groups out there concerned about this issue, when that couldn’t be further from the truth. But let’s be fair. Perhaps they had an editorial in the same paper recently that I missed and McLeroy is simply responding to it. In any case, let’s be clear: these are not the only people making a fuss.
Regardless, how can McLeroy repeat that “this will not happen”? What other reasons would creationists have for wanting to have a say in the science TEKS? And how can he definitively dictate what may or may not happen?
McLeroy then makes a statement to stun all Biology teachers and evolution supporters across the world:
First, is understanding of evolution “vital” to the understanding of biology? No.
I guess McLeroy isn’t familiar with the famous Dobzhansky article that really sums it all up: “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”.
Next, has evolution been demonstrated to be true beyond any reasonable doubt? No.
Is evolution’s support from the peer-reviewed literature unassailable? No.
If these are the criteria by which evolution has come under assault, then much of science should be suffering under the same scrutiny. No scientific theory is ever going to be proven to be 100% true. No theory is safe from criticism and peer review. That’s the beauty of the scientific method–which, many scientists will agree, HAS shown evolution to be true beyond “reasonable doubt”.
Does evolution have scientific “weaknesses”?
The 21st Century Coalition not only says no but insists that we must strike the weaknesses language from our standards because leaving it in threatens our children’s scientific reasoning.
If we’re not going to apply the same “weaknesses” technique to all other scientific theories, then yes, it certainly does threaten our children’s scientific reasoning. Our students deserve a 21st century science education, not watered-down science, whether it is biology, astronomy, chemistry, etc.