How Intelligent Design cheats: proponents try to circumvent the scientific method

Many IDers are asking to include intelligent design in science curriculum because it is only “fair” to present “both sides” of the story to students. Listen to Kenneth Miller explain why including ID in science curriculum is anything but fair.

Like this post? Email it to a friend.

This entry was posted on March 20, 2008 at 2:29 pm and is filed under Education, Evolution with tags atheism, Biology, Christianity, creationism, Education, Evolution, fairness, intelligent design, Kenneth Miller, science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “How Intelligent Design cheats: proponents try to circumvent the scientific method”

alexanderthegreatest Says:
March 21, 2008 at 7:05 am

Come on. Nobody’s circumventing the scientific method. They’re redefining it. Throwing dice and talking in circles is the new scientific method.

If someone can get Colbert to say it, it’s truth(y).

If it sounds half way plausible, it’s good enough to sell.
Richard Dawkins crashing “Expelled” screening? « Airtightnoodle’s Weblog Says:
March 22, 2008 at 1:53 pm

[…] actually NOT result in teaching both of them, as Intelligent Design is NOT scientific. See the Kenneth Miller video two posts back to see what I mean. While the Evolution/Intelligent Design debate can spark much […]

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Blog of the Airtightnoodle